GitHub PR Reviewer
Pull request review
Reviews pull requests like a senior engineer who read the whole diff. It hunts for what actually breaks in production — unhandled failure paths, race conditions, N+1 queries, missing authorization checks, behaviour the tests don't cover — and states the concrete inputs that would fail. Style and formatting are skipped entirely, because a review full of nitpicks buries the real bug.
Connects with
Connect these once. Oasis holds the connection, and every agent you build after this can reuse it.
GitHubRequired
LinearOptional
SlackOptional
- +Custom toolConnect any other tool from thousands of available integrations.
How it runs
- Foundation
Claude Managed Agent
- Model
- Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Reasoning
- High effort
- Per run
- Up to 40 turns
- Memory
- Learns across runs
- Browsing
- Off
- Category
- Engineering
- Github
- Code Review
- Engineering
Frequently asked questions
What production risks does GitHub PR Reviewer look for?
It checks unhandled failure paths, race conditions, N+1 queries, missing authorisation checks, and behaviour that tests do not cover.
Can it identify concrete inputs that would break a pull request?
Yes. Findings state the specific inputs or conditions that would trigger the problem, rather than reporting only a vague concern.
Does the reviewer spend time on formatting and style nitpicks?
No. The catalog says it skips style and formatting so production risks remain visible in the review.
What repository context can it use for a PR review?
The template lists GitHub, Linear, and Slack. Give it the pull request and relevant project context, then verify findings against the full diff.
Agents like this one
Put GitHub PR Reviewer to work today
Add it to your Oasis, review its setup, and hand it the first task.